First, if I were going to listen to someone on this board, you'd be the last person. As far as what I've offered, what I did was quote the exact rule, word for word, not my opinion. The rule for roughing specifically says after it is clear the ball has been thrown. Therefore if a hit on the passer is legal in its timing but has a PF aspect to it, like the original play, it is a PF, not roughing.
As usual, you've dodged the details, you've filled the pages with your crap and I know for a fact that since I've been on this forum you have dodged every question I've ever posed to you and you've dodged them because your answer to my questions would have proven you wrong. Hearing you say you're open minded and will consider new evidence is total BS. You are on here for one reason only and that is to sling crap at others who disagree with you.
The only one on here barking that they're right is you. No one else has disputed my posts but you. No one. The sad thing is that you aren't but you're not man enough to nut up and admit it. I don't need to join your club. I'm in my 3rd decade of doing this. The only thing I need to understand from you is that you're a nut job.
|