Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L
Would not this line of reasoning imply that a receiver who jumps for the ball, possesses it over the EZ but whose jump now carries him out of the EZ (without any defensive contact) scores a TD?
And I'm still waiting for someone to adequately explain why the casebook play has the requirement of the receiver being downed when apparently it makes no difference.
|
Absolutely not, at some point you really have to actually read NF: 2-4.
NF: 2-4-1, "A
catch is the act of
establishing player possession of a live ball which is in flight, and
first contacting the ground inbounds .......or.......being contacted by an opponent in such a way that he is
prevented from returning to the ground inbounds while maintaining control of the ball.
As for your second question, the only person who can answer that, factually, is whomever wrote the casebook narrative.