Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Your post suggests that you think contact is required for interference. That's incorrect: it's possible to hinder a player without touching him.
I thought that the umpire judged that the fielder was not hindered, despite the crappy throw to F6 covering.
If this happened on my field, I'm pretty sure it would be INT, especially given the crappy throw.
|
I know you can have interference without touching him...
__________________
"My greatest fear is that when I die, my wife will sell my golf clubs for what I told her I paid for them."
|