|
Slippery When Wet ???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty
It is a real stretch to consider a tattoo to be taunting. What if your religious tattoos offend me? It's a slippery slope...
|
It wasn't such a stretch back in 1996-97:
1996-97 NFHS Points of Emphasis: Permanent tattoos pose problems if they are objectionable for one reason or another. School administrators and/or coaches have an obligation to have objectionable markings of a permanent type covered. It is not in the best interest of the game to have officials placed in a position where from game to game they must rule on what is objectionable. Obviously, officials can and will make these decisions when outright vulgarity or obscenity is involved or when such markings violate sportsmanship and/or taunting or baiting regulations.
Remember, offensive was never part of the point of emphasis. Only school administrators and/or coaches had too deal with objectionable tattoos. Officials were only asked to deal with vulgar, or obscene tattoos, and such tattoos also had to violate sportsmanship and/or taunting or baiting regulations.
I do agree that it's a slippery slope.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
Last edited by BillyMac; Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 06:41am.
|