Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
Here's the way I would answer your partner's view: the runner was obviously impeded, and it doesn't matter if the runners was impeded in the runner's intent to advance one more step or 60'; the runner was impeded. We don't require the runner to be making an attempt to advance to the next base, only that the runner be legally running the bases.
|
The runner was going to where F5 was, and likely beyond, so progress was impeded to R1's desired point.