Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
The ball was nearby, and F5's rationale for tying up the runner was to have his teammate pick up the ball and tag the runner.
That's still a play on the runner and thus Type A OBS.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RPatrino
Mike has it right. There was a play being made on the runner, so that makes this Type A obstruction. My interpretation is that in a run down situation, a runner being run back to a base is still having a play made upon him.
|
Michael & Bob,
The following definition of "a play", which is defined nowhere in the text of the rules, appears in the MLBUM:
Quote:
...A play or attempted play is interpreted as a legitimate effort by a defensive player who has possession of the ball to actually retire a runner. This may include an actual attempt to tag a runner, a fielder running toward a base with the ball in an attempt to force or tag a runner, or
actually throwing to another defensive player in an attempt to retire a runner. (The fact that the runner is not out is not relevant.) ...
|
While I would agree that a "...runner in a rundown..." who is obstructed is properly ruled "Type A" and that the runner was being "played upon" just prior to the obstruction occurring, at the time of the obstruction, he was NOT being played upon.
No member of the defense had possession of the ball and no throw was in progress. The ball was "loose".
JM