Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
I have no problem looking at both sides. 
I don't think his idea does what you think it does. There would not need to be an exception to the location rule. When the player jumped, where were they? While their location is considered to be where they last touched the floor, they didn't jump from the FC becasue FC didn't exist. The only thing that existed when they jumped was inbounds/out-of-bounds. |
Not really - in your case the only thing that needs to change is the definition of front court and back court. Neither exisits until there is player and team control on the floor. Player location wouldn't change, because they would still have a location of inbounds or OOB. They just would not have a location of FC or BC, because those locations don't exist for the purpose of a violation until the new definition kicks in. The same general theory as the lane - it doesn't really exist for the purposes of a violation until certain conditions are met first.
No messy exceptions needed.
So, is this what debate class is like - I argue your point, and you argue mine?