Quote:
|
It is not that I am disagreeing with anyone,
|
Of course, you are or we wouldn't have reached this point.
Look, you asked the question and were supplied answers. You asked the UIC and got an answer you didn't like. You asked here and got an answer you didn't like. You continue an attempt to justify your contention that the rule book is lacking when, in fact, in this case it is not.
This is like a traveling salesman trying to sell a cow pie to a cattle farmer. Your attempt to twist and turn anything related to INT on a BR into something it isn't is just plain old bull****.
Every scenario is not in ANY rules book. Just because a negative isn't proven doesn't mean it is not addressed.
Does your scenario meet any specific violation in the rule book? Obviously not, or that rule would have been cited. So, if it isn't a violation, it must not be against any rules, hence legal and in play.
Let me play your game. B4 hits a ball on an open field for an eventual home run. The player runs to 1B, then 3B, then 2B and finally, to home.
The defense appeals the runner for missing 2B and for generally not running the bases in the proper order.
Should the run be allowed to score? If not, why not?