View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 22, 2009, 11:35am
jwwashburn jwwashburn is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrUmpire View Post
No one will argue that owners and rats believe this.
I assume that by rats, you mean the players, coaches and managers. Is it your contention that they think that the umpiring is good enough? Really?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrUmpire View Post
The problem is that this short-sighted thinking has already cost MiLB some of their more promising umpires and, over the years, may well contribute to a lowering of excellence in MLB.
You might be right about this. I was reacting to the "they should" argument. They 'should' do with their money whatever they feel like doing. If your premise is correct and the owners realize it and they care, then they will probably start paying more to MILB umpires.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrUmpire View Post
However, if MLB ever decides that quality is important, at some point what is best for the sport will need to be considered, just as many companies have had to consider what is good for the industry when they negotiate with workers.
You are making two rather large assumptions here:

1) The MILB is actually losing significant numbers of umpires that would make meaningful contributions in the MLB

AND

2) They are not being replaced by others who would make similar contributions.
Reply With Quote