Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
In the OP, I choose to live with the improper whistle.
|
And you would choose to go against the POI rule and case play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
There is wiggle room in the wording regarding a blarge. If you want to reopen that, I'd be glad to contribute.
|
There's only "wiggle room" in your mind, not in the rule. And no, it's pretty much a closed discussion for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
Try this one. I am trail, two whistle. Player fumbles the ball at the top to the key, then struggles to recover. This happens right in front of me. As the ball is rolling on the floor, partner, from the lead, with all the other traffic in between, whistles and signal a travel.
Did I almost puke? yes Did I stop the game, confer with partner, explain the traveling rule and ask for an accidental whistle declaration? no
Would you?
|
First, are you 100% sure there was not a travel before the ball came loose? Are you 100% sure they did not see the play? If so, then:
- Confer with partner as to what their call was? Yes.
- Explain the traveling rule? No.
- Give my partner the information that the player did not control of the ball? Absolutely.
- Give them the opportunity to explain their call, or give them the chance to declare an accidental whistle rather than penalize a team that should not be penalized? Yep.
- Check to see who would've picked up the ball if the whistle had not blown? Nope.
- Tried to figure out what's fair? Nope.
Why wouldn't you, as a crew, get the call right if you are 100% sure the call was blown?
Ok, I'm officially done with this discussion. We obviously disagree with the spirit and intent of the POI rule involving accidental whistles. Maybe the committee will adopt the NCAA definition for additional clarity. Maybe it doesn't need any additional clarity.
