Thread: foul or no foul
View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 09, 2000, 03:00pm
Gary Brendemuehl Gary Brendemuehl is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 62
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Todd VandenAkker
Quote:

However, if the shot misses, it could very likely have been caused by even light contact, such as on the arm--just enough to throw the shot off--and, thus, SHOULD be called. The ball going through or missing may, in this situation, be the best way of determining the significance of such light contact. Remember, severity of contact in and of itself does not determine a foul, but rather the IMPACT of the contact on the play (advantage-disadvantage): severe contact could be a no-call, while very light contact could be a foul.
My primary objection is passing on heavier contact just because the shot is made. If the contact hinders the normal offensive movements, the offensive player is at a disadvantage. Just because a stronger player can adjust to heavier contact and still make the shot, he is still hindered and is entitled to the fouls shots regardless of the outcome of the shot.
Reply With Quote