Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
Rather than quoting Jim Evans let me give you a general thought:
Umpire mechanics have been developed over decades by professionals that are well trained and take into consideration all type of issues when developing umpire processes.
Even the NFHS with their outdated mechanics had a basic philosophy (hard to change) of why they had their specific system of umpiring.
In a conversation with Evans he basically wanted to know WHY umpires working games played by non-professional players INSIST on changing systems (processes) to suit themselves. People that developed the systems know that umpire crews of 2 and 3 umpires are based on compromise.
In this instance Evans would tell you the PU should stay home and allow the BU to handle the simplicity of a maximum of two base runners whereas the PU can stay home and not be compromised by an errant throw at third and be in race-to-the-plate with the advancing runner.
We will just have to agree to disagree on this one.
And I will post about anything that I select to be involved in . . . if you don't like it don't read the thread.
|
Evans has been training umpires for the professional game forever. So much so that he doesn't even recognize that his system isn't the be-all end-all for amateur umpires of varying quality. Of course, if you and I are working you know I'll come set, make a quality call, turn as I'm signaling, get an angle, make a great call at third, blah, blah, blah.
Smitty will make both calls on the run and miss one and be horribly out of position on the other. I'd rather let Smitty stay with the call at first and be waiting in the cutout for the play at third.
I don't have the 2-man (red book) handy, but I believe the PU taking this second play *is* the advanced mechanic (or the standard mechanic) depending on the year.