View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 04, 2009, 09:34am
JugglingReferee JugglingReferee is offline
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by iiicream View Post
I'm getting my feet wet this year as an evaluator. Going from the court to the stands. Thanks, in advance, for any help in making the evaluation process a positive one.

Would you, as an official, prefer to know if there is an evaluator in the stands?

Would you want to meet with him/her before, during half-time, or after the game?

Would you like verbal critiques or a hard copy of the evaluation or both?
Without hard copies, the evaluations means a lot less.

Before hand is good because you can communicate to the evaluator something that you are working on. He will then know the 1 or 2 things that you're looking to solidify in that game.

Half-time is possible, but I think for someone that "adjusts quickly" and could possibly fix something else in the 2nd half.

I do prefer to know before-hand. However, this is because my local association sends evaluators in to watch after the game has started. It's not uncommon for them to miss the at least some of the first quarter.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote