|
Sorry for my previous post. It was not meant to be hostile, but it definitely read that way.
For the record, I started this reading this thread opposed to checks and would now support limited background checks if my state proposes them.
For completeness, Cameron's summary missed one point. They can be expensive, and it appears that some states are going overboard in what they require. Cost would be an issue for me, and might make not officiate even though my record is clean. Do checks, but keep them simple and inexpensive if possible, and provide an appeal process.
|