I'm sorry if my persistence is causing frustration. All I've tried to do in this thread is post the actual rule and then ask a question. Each time someone has given an explanation or interpretation, I think that I have been able to show that the explanation or interpretation does not actually reflect the actual rule, as written.
As I said earlier in the thread, I'm not looking for trouble. I'm not trying to find justification for calling a fault on a player who is attempting a block. But it seems pretty obvious, in fact GLARINGLY obvious, that the interpretation contradicts the rule; and leads to undesired consequences if thought through logically.
|