Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
The throwin ended when the ball touched B1. Since the throwin ended, this situation occurred after the throwin, but before team control was established. That's what I meant to say. I think.
|
I understand what you were getting at, that the OP is, in contrast with the interp, a situation with no team control. Could be a shot, the original jump ball, or a throwin. I thought (at the time) you were looking at the throwin exception.
My point, however, in answer to your next post, is that while the interp very obviously mentions team control, the leap to that interp from the rule is much smaller than the leap from that interp to another one that says the OP is a violation.
If one event can qualify for two things that must happen at different points in time (the interp) in one instance, why can't they happen in another?
I agree that the team control thing, or the lack of it, would most likely help the committee keep their heads on this one.