Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
Agree with Steve for championship play. I think some are a little bat snatch happy... and thats not entirely their fault. IMO, some is the fault of ASA who respond to bat mfg's recommends who..guess what they want to do? Sell bats! This is a source of great discontent when 1/2 of a teams bats are removed under what are IMO, questionable reasons.
I think the eye should be towards safety.. not any ding the bat may have.
For beer league slow pitch, let em play homey. wtf?   |
Where do you think most of the lawsuits originate? It certainly isn't championship play and there may be a reason for that (see comment above).
Teams lose 1/2 their bats because they don't buy smart. The sheeple follow the crowd. "If Susie has bat A and hits the ball, then so will my little Margie." Too many people actually believe the keystone of performance is the equipment, not the player and IMO that is part of the reason why the bats have come to the forefront as an issue.
Dummies go out and pay $250-$350 for a piece of equipment they go through pains to get broken in and then expect the thing to last a couple years. As a bat becomes broken in, it also begins to break down and that is where they become dangerous.
Have you ever seen a bat "explode"? Pieces go everywhere. Allowing the dents and dings go was okay with the aluminum. I don't think the composite bats are as durable to withstand flaws, constructural or developed through use, as well as aluminum.