View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 06, 2002, 06:01pm
Camron Rust Camron Rust is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally posted by AK ref SE
My response to Hawks coaches question would be......First of all B1 had not established inbounds status so a ball deflecting of his head to in bounds would be an out of bounds violation! I would probably blow the whistle.....Give the ball back to A and give him/her the end line.......If Coach B gets upset let him know that you could have called a T for his player touching the ball on the OOB side of the line! Just a guess! But that is what I would do...until someone on the board corrects me!

AK ref SE
I agree with your ruling. But, I don't think that was the intent of the question with respect to the explanation.

It would probably be coach A complaining that their was no T. In that case, I would tell coach A that the intent of the rule that warrants a T is to prevent B from trying to intercept/block that pass. B has the right to get back inbounds from the previous play and is even required to get directly inbounds or be at risk for a T. For that matter, you would have to call the violation (warning) on B for even being across te line during the throwin.

As you concluded, a simple violation on B for toucing the ball while OOB.
Reply With Quote