Quote:
Originally Posted by kylejt
I think you're missing the point.
He could not have possibly seen the miss, because, well, there was no miss. You have to clearly see it, to make this call.
The point of this whole conversation (hopefully) is to educate others. On a play like this, you have to be 100% sure that the plate wasn't touched. That wasn't the case here, obviously. He had to have been screened out by the runner's body. And when that happens, you can't assume the miss.
|
No, you're missing my point, which is the umpire called what he "saw" as the correct call. MLB umpires do not intentionally make the wrong call any more than any of us do. He believed he got it right.
Then, he saw that he didn't on replay and admitted his error.
That's one difference between MLB and amateur umpiores they have replay to show them when they get it wrong, even when they think they are right.
We believe we get calls right, and thanks to not having contrary evidence played over and over, get to continue thinking that and then write posts on the internet claiming we've never made such a mistake.