View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 12, 2009, 10:32pm
Reffing Rev. Reffing Rev. is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: midwest/plains
Posts: 402
Our group was again divided...
4 said it was a legal play because the defender was not being blocked.
1 said it was a clip because the fbz only applied to initial action on the line and this was too late afterwards. (He is admittedly our regular BJ who doesn't deal much with the fbz)
1 (me) said it was a chop. As I picture the play in my mind it just looked wrong, as I thought about why it was wrong I went with the chop because the defender was engaged and unable to protect himself from the low block.
Reply With Quote