Thu Aug 06, 2009, 08:05pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 1,319
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe
On the basis of "making %h(t up".
I will say again, the text is clear. The two statements are independent of each other. In a text requiring precise language and definitions (a rule book), it is illogical to me, to put an order or sequence on the events without the appropriate language indiciating that such order exists.
It would be similar to me saying that in order to hit a golf ball, you have to have both a ball and a club. The order in which you obtain these two things is irrelevant, but you must have both in order to do it. Likewise, for end of the run enforcement on RTP, you must have both of those conditions met but the order in which they occur is irrelevant.
|
EXACTLY! In order for K to legally possess a free kick, the ball must be grounded and have gone 10 yards. Does the order matter? Nope!
__________________
Mike Sears
|