View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 29, 2009, 11:34pm
Rich Ives Rich Ives is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by ren0901 View Post
With that cleared up, I'm still confused about Marazzi's article - is there any circumstance where, "A ball lodging in the catcher's protector or uniform is a live ball and in play"?
It's because of the timing. There was no formal interpretation at the time Marazzi wrote the article. He wrote it before MLB published the rule.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote