Quote:
Originally Posted by fiasco
Wow, really? Just a few pages ago, you said (quite vehemently):
"I happen to believe that we should defer to primary coverage areas." And proceeded to outline how exactly you would "handle" someone who did not follow this line of thinking.
Now you're agreeing that, as long as you're a "good" official, and it falls within some arbitrary category, you can reach into your partner's area.
Interesting. Why the sudden change in opinion?
|
I haven't changed my opinion at all. You just don't understand my point.
I wrote the above words in the context of making such a call on a play that your partner could not or did not see, not one which he merely saw differently from you. You have advocated not caring why your partner didn't call what you think should be called, and just making your call. You aren't
deferring to the primary official, you are blowing your whistle and overriding his decision. I don't believe that is proper.
However, I agree that it is certainly proper to help with something that your partner isn't able to cover. Good officials know when that occurs. You don't seem to grasp the distinction.