View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 05, 2009, 07:55pm
SanDiegoSteve SanDiegoSteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
As J/R describes CI (chapter 14), the batter must do something besides stand there and take the pitch. The two examples provided have the batter either "striding" but not swinging, or "partially squared" to bunt.

As described in the OP, the batter is confused and does not attempt to swing. But if he moves at all, I'm getting CI here. The only way I'd ignore this infraction would be if the batter was taking all the way. The benefit of the doubt goes to the batter in this case.
Absolutely. Being confused is not the same as being interfered with. The batter must show some action that he had planned to swing at the pitch.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote