Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul L
#3: A runner tying his shoes during live ball will get less protection than a runner tracking a fly ball. A runner who moves into the fielder's path while maintaining contact with the base while not noticing F6 because he is tracking the ball will get more protection than if he was aware of F6's path and could have avoided or reduced contact. And if the runner's movement is judged to be intentional, then maybe interference and two outs. In short, there are many variables happening at the same time that contribute to the umpire's call. HTBT.
|
How can a runner whos tying his shoes act in any manner thats considered intentional, hes tying his shoes not paying attention to anything!!!
maybe theres a different rule that applies here that im not aware of that someone could be so kind as to set the record straight.