View Single Post
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 30, 2009, 08:33pm
SanDiegoSteve SanDiegoSteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11 View Post
Do you say the same thing about a catcher who gets INT by a batter on a throw to third? WHAT IS THE BATTER DOING THERE!? He has no right to INT with any play the catcher is making.
Different situation entirely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11 View Post
I'd have to be there, but if I felt that F2 was making a legit play on R1, then I don't see how we don't have INT. If F2 was being one of those LL catchers who throws to 1st base after a walk, then I have nothing.
How did he interfere with a thrown ball? Intentionally? If not, no INT. Just a bad throw by the catcher.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11 View Post
Vision it this way SDS - LHB takes a step towards his 1st base dugout to toss the bat to the dugout after ball 3. Catcher rightfully steps behind the batter to throw behind R1, but has to alter his throw because of batter's presence. This seems to be clear INT.
You are visioning it as you would like it to be, which alters the OP. This batter had taken off running. He was not interfering with F2's throwing the ball. He was hit by a thrown ball.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11 View Post
Would have to be there to see the speed and timing of the whole thing. I can vision this happening a BUNCH of different ways at the LL level, all resulting in a different call. Interesting play...
There ya go!
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25

Last edited by SanDiegoSteve; Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 10:09pm. Reason: change BR to batter
Reply With Quote