Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Let me rephrase...we, the referees who make the correct call,....
|
Hard to say that when you don't know what the correct call is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
All fine except it is all wrong.
|
I say the same thing about your opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
A player gets a spot "on the playing court", not in the air over another player and his/her spot. A1, having his/her arms over B1 is not in that spot at all. A1 is invading B1's spot. Again, you are not in a spot just becasue you get your arms over the spot.
|
So whenever a player reaches out to grab a ball over an opponent's head, that opponent would be smart to reach up and smack his arms away.
That fits your description of a legal play.
BTW I notice that you didn't respond to my "George Gervin" example.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
If that were even remotely true, you could set a screen by extendeding your arms into a space before the another player arrives....but the rules clearly indicate that having the arms extended into a space doesn't give that player the right to that spot.
|
Screening is a contact situation. The rules are specifically written with the expectation that contact will occur. Therefore, it would be dangerous to allow players to extend their arms and elbows as if blocking like an offensive lineman. A screener must allow the opponent to come to him and cause the contact. That is why screening isn't a foul. If the screener reaches out and causes the contact that's illegal.
That is completely different from this situation in which the player is not attempting to cause contact. He is jumping and/or reaching over an opponent to catch the ball. He is not the one who is causing any contact. It is the player who reacts late who causes the contact.