I think it is a good idea. Umpires need to be held accountable for their actions. And, sometimes, an evaluator outside the fence can't see/hear everything. But, as you said, many(if not most) will have to be sifted through for things more than just a rant b/c they didn't like the strike zone and need to be taken lightly.
But, if an umpire does something like this which seems impossible to be made up, then assigners need to know and handle the situation.
I think, if done properly and followed through, it can be effective.
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is"
|