Quote:
Originally Posted by OCASA
Why should an umpire be looking to protect a DMR (dumb move runner) in a judgment call?
What business does an umpire have protecting anybody?
Call it like you see it. Saying "DMC" is presumptuous. Maybe it wasn't, maybe the runner saw the catcher release the ball and deliberately turn there back to it. We don't know. The general consensus is look for the obvious intent. Canary made an evaluation against his own player, and felt s/he deliberately blocked the play.
As already stated "Judgment Call"
|
What is dumb is the ridiculous actions of runners on 3rd when they run toward the plate.
IMO, the OP indicates the runner was turned away from the plate, so I doubt there was any INT on behalf of the runner.
BTW, the runner determines their path and if it happens to be in the catcher's perceived throwing lane, the catcher better find another lane or don't throw the ball.
Yeah, it was DMC.