Quote:
Originally posted by williebfree
Another "observation": (NOT "picking on" the individuals who made these posts)
Examine these statements: "If it had the potential to affect the outcome of the game..."; "If I thought there was a chance that the (incorrect) call would effect the outcome of the game..."
Why do I bring these up? They give credence to the mentality that the officials' call at the end of the game is more important than the first whistle! Comments?
|
I think you're right - our calls should be as consistent as possible: fix every clock error, a foul at 7:59 should be the same as a foul at 0:01, etc.
BUT
I see the "come in and fix stuff" like a 'get out of jail free' card - you really can't use it too many times in a game, otherwise the coaches, players, and fans are going to be questioning every call and demanding that the officials conference.
I'm not saying to not talk on a confusing situation (esp. double or triple whistles), but the change should be a very rare occasion.