Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
I disagree. The distinction between retouch and missed base appeals has nothing to do with how obvious the appeal is.
The two appeals are governed by different rules. 7.08(d) and 7.10(a) for retouch appeals, and 7.10(b) and 7.10(d) for missed base appeals.
Especially extending 7.10(d) to all bases makes a difference since it includes the expression "makes no attempt to return." That expression does not appear in the rule for retouch appeals.
|
So in the play discussed in the following thread (
Tigers vs Injuns 5-1-09 Laz Diaz? no-call), would you call this an "unmistakable" appeal by the defense?