Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
I hate to disagree with your UIC, but I think the interp is dead wrong. To start, it doesn't meet the definition of obstruction.
That statement is part of a direction which was being used to get the coaches and players to understand the change in the rule. This one sentence was not meant to stand independent.
If the runner is not affected by the defender's action, it is nothing.
|
I agree with you, but when in Rome.
My wish, is ASA drop the wording as state this interp does not meet the obstruction definition.