Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
This logic is incorrect. Intent is a requirement of malice.
|
Not when you take into account all the safety rules written in FED. Webster's may define it with intent, but they didn't write the FED rule book.
With the new defensive malicious contact written into the rules, a hard tag could be considered malicious.
This tag was in the face, it didn't have to be, it COULD be malicious even without intent.