Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Camron raises some good points concerning the true value of an official in the different systems. I'll give my thoughts on the concerns that he raised.
1. Time - are we paid for our time or our service? Camron is 100% correct that it takes just as much time to work a game 2-man as 3-man. However, it is a debatable question whether officials should be paid like an hourly wage earner or as a contractor who charges a fee for completing a project no matter what length of time it takes.
|
Both.
Contractors build "time" into their bid since they can only do so much at one time. If they guess wrong, they eat it or profit, but they do build it in. The amount contracted for officiating a game should consider the time it takes to provide the service, not just the service itself.
Adding the 3rd person increases the quality of the service...and should the pay should scale accordingly....Chevette vs. Corvette.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
As for grief, you take what you allow. I can't say that it is necessarily related to the number of officials, but it makes sense that if there are more officials, then these people can take turns listening to whomever is complaining. Also, with the more frequent rotations in 3-man an official should find himself near a complaining coach less often.
|
Somewhat true. I was not necessarily talking about solely the coach/player behavior. Sometimes he situation is just not ideal you just have to deal with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
3. Your last sentence is very valid. In fact, I am arguing that the number of officials should have NOTHING at all to do with the fee. It should solely depend upon the amount of work required to officiate a game. Therefore, the total game fee should be invariant. It is just a matter of how many people those involved wish to use to do the job. The overall task doesn't change though. Why aren't the schools asking to use only a single official? They could pay him 1.5 times his 2-man rate and save even more money!  |
However, if you agree that the quality of the product provided by 3 is imporved, you can make the claim that the amount of total work done is actually increased.
They could even have 0 do the job and have no need for that part of the budget...but you know the quality of those games would be like.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
If you are doing more than 2/3 of the work in a 3-man game or 1/2 in a 2-man contest, then your partner isn't pulling his share of the load. It's really that simple.
|
You inferred the wrong baseline....I'm saying one officials workload in 3 doesn't drop to 2/3rds of the workoad in 2. I'm not talking about the share between members of the crew.