View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 10:50pm
Matt Matt is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Upper Midwest
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
Read the original post.
Given the coach's own words, it's #22 for #25. Absent any mention of other players, that's what it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
There was no mention of batting infractions, only that #22 replaced #25 in LF. There is no batting order infraction mentioned in the post. One must conclude that only fielding changes have been made illegally.
How do you arrive at this conclusion? Since when are only fielding changes affected by a substitution?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
#8 has to leave. DH who was batting for him entered on defense. Defensive player must leave the game when his DH enters on defense.
Cite? Or is it that the DH is forbidden to enter while the fielder for which he is batting is still fielding?
Reply With Quote