View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 13, 2009, 12:10pm
jicecone jicecone is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spence View Post

If the catcher left part (even a very small part) of the plate uncovered I would assume its a legal play. True?
And this is the portion that makes this rule argumentative, instead of just saying with out possession of the ball, you can't be there, the umpire can always say there was some access to the base and the coach will for sure disagree. I am not 100% sure , but I think that the NCAA interpertation is, no ball possesion, you can't be there..
Reply With Quote