The first post in this thread contains the Redding play and interpretation that supports this.
As far as the actual wording of the rule is concerned, I don't know how "touching" can be any simpler and imply anything than the present tense of the verb.
With all due respect, it appears you are trying to make the rules fit your interpretation.
In regard to the "intent" that you mention in your previous post, you're not alluding to the spirit of the rule are you?
