Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBooth
The aforementioned unfortunately is what often happens on the internet.
We are NOT talking about WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE.
|
Incorrect. As most often the case when someone presents a scenario that results in a sh!ithouse, most posters were, indeed, addressing what should have been done.
Quote:
|
I was responding to what ACTUALLY happened.
|
Only in part. You still addressed what you thought SHOULD have happend by suggesting action the BU SHOULD have taken. One can't participate in a discussion like this without addressing what SHOULD have happened. To do otherwise would be to simply repeat and analyze what happened without offering a solution.
The difference between your "should of" and most everyone elses "should of" is simply one of timing. Most others chose to step back further in time and explain what proper procedure would have prevented the whole mess. You just didn't step back in time as far and presented a solution that some of us don't feel is as professional; that is mirroring, even against one's better judgement. That's still addressing what should of, not what did.