View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 31, 2009, 10:13pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
FED 2009 interp seems to imply that both infractions are penalized. So, I'd have R1 at second (on the OBS) and BR out (on the INT, since R1 can't be out).
In situation 15 this is not the same since BR was not being played on. If we follow FEDs logic runner from 2b scores because he was obstructed going home, runner from 1b is called out due to interference by the obstructed runner who interferes with catcher's attempt to retire runner from 1b, and BR gets 1B since he was not involved at all in the play.
Reply With Quote