Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
You're right, that section does refer to ball location, and the fact that the ball has the same location as the official when it touches the official.
However, you're thinking the official is deemed OOB, because one foot is out, even though the ball touched the leg that is still inbounds. That would be correct if you were talking specifically about a player, which is covered in 4-35. But does that also cover the official's location? Isn't the official more like an "object", in terms of inbounds vs. OOB? If you consider an "object" to be OOB because part of it is, how come the backboard isn't considered OOB, since it's attached to something that is OOB?
(Btw, I'm not 100% sure of the answer, so I would like to be convinced one way or the other.  ) |
I too am less than 100% sure of the answer and am making up my arguments as I go. But for arguments sake, how about this.
I consider the ref to have the same IB/OOB location as a player because he/she can change their location. Objects like a backboard cannot. In addition, not all of the backboard is considered inbounds.
And the foot bone is connected to the ankle bone, the ankle bone is connected . . . well you know.