Quote:
Originally Posted by SAump
Surprised to hear the following passage was different from opinions expressed above. Will this web discussion become more descriptive? I'm interested in hearing more about the FED caseplay, with or without the inclusion of the dropped 3rd strike scenario.
|
FED has a rule to the effect that "the umpire shall rectify any situation where a decision that was reversed has place a team at a disadvantage."
So, when the call is changed from "ball" to "strike" on the check swing, if the offense was put at a disadvantage, then the out should be nullified. That usually happens when R1 is NOT stealing, but advances toward second on the "ball" call.
If R1 is stealing and is "thrown out", then there wasn't any disadvantage and the out stands.
NCAA and OBR do not have such a rule. The rules are written for older players and the players should know not to advance until the final decision has been reached.