|
NF Case Play
Below is a case play similar to yours. I believe we are to "infer" the same in your case, since the running the endline throw-in from Team A did not legally end due to the kick by Team B, Team A should maintain those privileges until the throw-in legally ends.
*4.42.5 SITUATION: Team A is awarded an alternating-possession throw-in. A1’s throw-in pass is illegally kicked by B2. RULING: As a result of B2’s kicking violation, Team A is awarded a new throw-in at the designated spot nearest to where the kicking violation (illegal touching) occurred. Since the throw-in was not contacted legally, the throw-in had not ended. The arrow remains with Team A for the next alternating-possession throw-in. (6-4-4)
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Last edited by grunewar; Mon Mar 16, 2009 at 12:52pm.
|