My question is: Has ASA implemented a rule change in 2000 that allows for a Batter-runner to step next to 1st base on the same type of play when no Orange part is being used.
I certainly hope not. I know there are some people of lesser intelligence that believe this would be a good thing, but where would you draw the line? "Neighborhood" tags have been accepted at particular levels, but I don't believe that it would be prudent to allow a runner, by rule, to miss a base intentionally.
How far would they allow the runner to step away from the bag and consider it legal? If at first, why not the rest of the bases on force plays for the same reason? What mechanics would umpires use to see how far the runner's foot was on the opposite side of the bag?
Too many questions and remember, this is from an umpire. Do you honestly think the players and coaches would understand it?
I had heard this same question about a month ago at a National Qualifier from a coach. My response was, "If the teams want the benefit of a double-base, buy on and carry it with you." The coach sort of looked at me like an idiot, turned around and walked away. Go figure!
------------------
Mike Rowe
DASA DUIC
NASO Member
|