I was going to specifically request you not post that picture when I wrote that.
I also caught the irony as I wrote to Texas Aggie. The difference is I'm admitting it's philosophical.
And, my point is that the throwin does not have to be completed, it only needs to be started for the arrow to have done it's job. I admit, however, that the committee wants there to be a full throwin following each AP opportunity before it switches.
I will say, however, that it's a bit inconsistent to reverse the arrow on an offensive violation but not an offensive foul.
BTW, I just realized the arrow would not switch if the offense commits a kicking violation before the throwin is over. It only switches on a legal touch or a "throwin violation."