Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
It has always been clear to me. I found it strange that the case book used to say to stop the game and give the ball back to the FTer without any penalty, but that's what I did because that was what the ruling said to do.
Now I don't that anymore.
He lost it. It's no longer at his disposal. Seems simple and logical to me.
|
I took a different reasoning for the case play; it prevents a defender from having to grab it and toss it away. Just call the violation. I agree with your bewilderment on the previous case play.
Your reasoning actually makes more sense to me, though.