Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef
Oh, must have heard the info wrong. A D-League buddy of mine called to asked what happened on the play b/c he couldn't figure out what was going on either.
In the closed thread Bob said the admin seemed correct. But I don't see how it can be correct if a dead ball foul of some type was called on Singler that involved contact.
You are correct, no need to look it up. A couple years ago there were False Double Fouls in the BC/Duke game that involved a taunting T against A1 followed up by a Intentional Contact Technical against B1. After administration Team A received the ball at the division line as a result of the foul against B1. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
NCAA 4-53-1e
Point of interruption is a procedure used to resume play because: Any technical foul(s). Exceptions: (Men) single intentional technical foul
and single flagrant technical foul.
NCAA 7-5-7
After a technical foul, a player of the offended team may attempt
the free throws and the ball shall be put back in play at the point of
interruption. Exceptions: (Men) Flagrant technical foul and intentional technical
foul, play shall resume by awarding the ball to the offended team at a
designated spot at the division line on either side of the playing court.
Help me out!
|
I stand corrected. I guess I can leave work now, I learned something new already.
-Josh