Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman
And now consider the situation where he catches the snap with at least one knee on the ground and then fumbles before he can place it for a kick or arise to continue play elsewise.
So it calls into question the rules committee's intent, which casts doubt on the case I first set forth.
Robert in the Bronx
|
Robert, NF: 2.18 describes the "official" definition of a fumble, which does not include purposefully placing, or dropping, a ball on the ground. The exception to 4.2.2.a, does provide guidance for a muffed snap or "fumble". The exception's intent seems pretty evident, in that it provides for an inadvertent loss of possession (fumble) or unsuccessful attempt to secure possession (muff), but does not cover any deliberate or intentional placing of the ball on the ground.
Consider, however, that the potential placekick holder would normally be a minimum of 5 yards behind the LOS, so there is little, if any whatsoever, potential benefit of a player picking up a ball left, 5 or more yards behind the line, trying to dive through defenders converging on the exact spot where the ball was left.
I know there is always a possibility, but this scenario even questions that.
A "planned loose ball infraction" is not applicable as NF 7.3.8 describes the infraction as, "Any A player
on his line of scrimmage may not advance a planned loose ball
in the vicinity of the snapper."