Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
You can rake all day, but the thing you're trying to move won't move unless you strike it with the rake. The ball moved.
|
4-18 FIGHTING
Fighting is a flagrant act and can occur when the ball is dead or live. Fighting
includes, but is not limited to combative acts such as:
ART. 1 . . .
An attempt to strike, punch or kick by using a fist, hands, arms, legs or feet regardless of whether contact is made.
So, if a player makes
contact with a player and the
player moves, are you going to call this
striking and eject the player for a flagrant foul?
Per 10-3-5 slapping or
striking the backboard is a technical foul. If a player touches the backboard, are you going to call a technical foul?
Just curious. As I stated earlier, I believe that the intent of the rule is to prohibit a player from intentionally
USING a foot to play the ball. The wording indicates
INTENTIONALLY STRIKING the ball with the foot or leg is prohibited. One could argue that raking is not striking. Based on the multiple definitions of
striking that are in the Rules Book, one could still interpret your play, in my opinion, as being legal -- even though I believe that the intent of the rule is to make it illegal.