Thread: Ruling
View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 06, 2009, 01:53pm
M&M Guy M&M Guy is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
And then what do you do if the FT shooting team violates?
The same thing you would do if the TO had not occured - follow 9-1 Penalties (4). It's pretty straight-forward.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Now we are going to apply a rule that no one is going to understand
I think it's only because it rarely happens. I've actually had to call this once, and it was a pretty simple explanation, "The TO doesn't erase the delayed violation". Coach didn't like it initially, but understood once it was explained.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
and makes no sense.
Well, maybe to you. Remeber, in this whole discussion, I haven't said whether I like it, only that I understand how it is to be called. There are many instances where "common sense" or "I think this should be called differently to be more fair" exists, but we're only left with following the rules, whether we agree or not.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote