
Fri Feb 06, 2009, 05:02am
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
JR:
Speaking per NFHS Rules only (because where play is continued after an intentional, non-flagrant foul in NCAA Rules makes it necessary for there to be a definition of an intentional TF) the point I am trying to make is, that penalty wise, under NFHS Rules, there is no difference between a non-intentional, non-flagrant TF and an intentional, non-flagrant TF: Two free throws and possession of the ball for a throw-in at the division line opposite the Scorer's/Timer's Table.
When the penalty for a non-intentional, non-flagrant TF was one free throw and possession of the ball for a throw-in at the division line (and at one time the team had the option as to which side of the court to take its throw-in for all TF's), there was a need for an intentional, non-flagrant TF. Now there is not.
Of course that does not mean that the actions that warrant a TF cannot be deemed intentional by rule, it just is not relevant anymore penalty wise.
MTD, Sr.
|
There's still one significant difference between an intentional TF and a flagrant TF ... the disqualification of the offender.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
|